• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Characterization and Remediation of Fractured Rock

Navigating this Website
1 Introduction
1 Introduction Overview
1.1 Characterizing Fractured Rock
1.2 Comparing Unconsolidated Porous Media CSMs and Fractured Rock CSMs
1.3 21- Compartment Model
1.4 Value of Investigation
2 Geology
2 Geology Overview
2.1 Elements of Terrane Analysis
2.2 Benefits of Terrane Information for the Initial CSM
2.3 Terrane Analysis Case Study
2.4 Terrane Analysis Summary
3 Hydrology
3 Hydrology: Fluid Flow Overview
3.1 Fractured Rock Characteristics
3.2 Fluid Dynamics
3.3 Vapors in Fractured Rock
3.4 Role of Scale in Fractured Rock Fluid Flow
4 Chemistry
4 Chemistry: Fate and Transport Overview
4.1 Fate and Transport Mechanisms
4.2 Contaminant Properties Affecting Fate and Transport
5 Site Characterization
5 Site Characterization Overview
5.1 Review and Refine Existing CSM
5.2 Define the Problem
5.3 Identify Significant Data Gaps
5.4 Define Data Collection Objectives and Design Data Collection Process
5.5 Select Investigation Tools
5.6 Develop and Implement Work Plan
5.7 Manage, Interpret, and Present Data
5.8 Lessons Learned
6 Remediation Design
7 Monitoring
8 Modeling Fractured Rock
9 Stakeholder Perspectives
10 Regulatory Challenges
11 Case Studies
11 Case Studies Overview
11.1 Former Industrial Site, Greenville, South Carolina
11.2 Solvents Recovery Service of New England, Inc., Superfund Site, Southington, Connecticut
11.3 Characterization of Fractured Bedrock, United Kingdom
Appendix A. Karst Terranes
Appendix B. Bedrock Types
Appendix C. Drilling
Appendix D. The 21-Compartment Model
Additional Information
Glossary
References
Acronyms
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Characterization and Remediation in Fractured Rocks
HOME

5.6 Develop and Implement Work Plan

The purpose of this step in the fractured rock site characterization process is twofold:

  1. Assemble and integrate the objectives that have been formulated to fill the data gaps in the CSM into an executable work plan. This work plan can be accepted by stakeholders and used to guide the data collection and analysis process.
  2. Implement the work plan and evaluate the results so that the CSM can be updated and evaluated for remaining data gaps.

5.6.1 Develop Project Work Plan

Developing a project work plan is not necessarily difficult. Depending on the scope of the characterization activities and regulatory requirements, the work plan can be a focused and streamlined document that can be prepared relatively quickly. A typical fractured bedrock characterization work plan should include the following criteria:

  • Emphasize characterization and data collection objectives.
  • Present a data collection process.
  • Include the tools selected.
  • Discuss the procedures/software/models that will be used for data evaluation and interpretation.

An well-designed work plan is flexible enough to allow changes to the characterization approach based on real-time results obtained during the investigation. A dynamic field approach using TRIAD principles, to the extent practical, is effective at fractured rock sites. This approach may require frequent (up to daily) calls or data uploads between the field team and project stakeholders. Frequent communication allows the team to review field activities and data, make decisions based on real-time data, and discuss next steps for efficiently completing the characterization. The work plan outlines the process for documenting field changes or adjustments during the site investigation. In addition, the work plan outlines the process for handling substantial changes to the investigation plan—beyond what is considered a standard field change.

The work plan includes sufficient information about selected tools to describe how each tool will be used, the investigation locations, types of data and to be generated, DQOs, data management, and data interpretation that will be performed. If the selected tools generate real-time data or nonstandard data (such as data beyond traditional analyte concentrations, or data generated by profiling or logging tools), the work plan describes how the data will be obtained and communicated to the project team. Also, the work plan describes how the data will be managed and stored along with other data used in the overall CSM.

5.6.2 Implement the Site Investigation

Once the work plan has been developed and approved, the next step is to implement the site investigation. Depending on the tools that are selected for the investigation, portions of this step may run concurrent to the initial phases of data management, interpretation, and presentation. If real-time or near-real-time data are being generated during the investigation, then these results can be evaluated as they are generated to help guide further data collection activities.

This guidance describes the overall process and framework for site characterization, rather than details on specific techniques or approaches for implementing field investigations. Sites should be investigated according to generally accepted principles and procedures for environmental fieldwork and should rely on the expertise of the project team. Any subcontractors or vendors that are used to deploy the selected tools should follow specific operating procedures and protocols.

image_pdfPrint this page/section



FracRx

web document
glossaryFracRx Glossary
referencesFracRx References
acronymsFracRx Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
Document Download
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected]rcweb.org • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.